2011年9月6日星期二

Quality metrics for electronics assembly



I am a procurement engineer for printed circuit assemblies (PCAs) and as
such the quality and technical interface between several external
contract manufacturers and my company-internal customers. Product
portfolio is highly complex, high-mix/low-volume with monthly
requirements ranging from 5 to 500. We have in place a well structured
supplier evaluation and rating process, where quality plays a
significant role in the scoring.
The main quality metric, both for absolute and comparative supplier
quality, is customer reported defect rate (ppm per component). While
this metric is fairly accurate, the time-lag between PCA production and
defect reporting is easily electronic assembly several months. This not only renders it
almost useless for corrective action and process improvement at the
supplier, but also means that I have no direct visibility to what I’ve
got in the pipeline.
Historically, PCAs were inspected (on sample basis) upon receipt before
we sent them on to the customer, but this was discontinued for the
biggest part with the argument that as the CMs are doing both in-circuit
test and 100% final inspection, we shouldn’t have to duplicate this (I
fully go along with this line of argument). Problem is only that I also
lost a quality metric in the process.
Another quality measure I am/was looking at is the internal quality
level at the CMs, but found this to be difficult to compare. In
addition, I don’t really see much correlation between this number and
what my customers are actually finding. My biggest gripe about internal
defect rate is that it is internally focused, i.e. tries to provide data
for process improvement, while I’d like to know the quality level going
out the door and ending up at my customers (externally focused).
However, the data are available for any potential statistical
evaluation.

I’ve been working on this metric issue for quite some time now, but
don’t seem to be getting any further. What I’m looking for ideally is an
early warning sign that makes aware that I am going to be hit, but which
also would allow me to initiate appropriate (internal) action to either
counteract any ‘hiccups’ or provide my customers with a warning so that
they can react before they are getting a potential line-down situation.
I know that theoretically the supplier should do all of this internally
and shield me, the customer, from any (excessive – whatever this means)
defects, but in real life the priorities are not always set this way.
I’d appreciate any ideas, further thoughts, experiences or other input
that would help me get a better handle on this.

没有评论:

发表评论